Don’t Kill my Kilay: why vanity tax is not superficial

By Nickky Faustine de Guzman 

Before the Women’s March participants turned to the streets on Jan. 21 to protest against Donald Trump, there was a local rally that transpired 10 days before it. And it involved beauty—but a whole lot more. 

The Filipino women turned to social media to protest against the proposed vanity tax, or the additional 10 to 30 percent tax on cosmetic products (including shampoo, deodorant, and toothpaste!!!) and beauty services. Although the outcry happened virtually, both protests that happened here and abroad were parallel in a way. They touched issues on misogyny, empowerment, and equality. 

Proposed by Ako Bicol Partylist Representative Rodel Batocabe, vanity tax aimed to offset the plan to decrease our income tax, which is at 32 percent and is one of the highest among ASEAN members. Simply put: the lower the tax income, the higher the take-home pay for the working class Filipinos. Reports said the proposal aimed to help the sin tax, or the tax collected from alcohol and tobacco. And as in the sin tax, the vanity tax planned to curb the consumption of beauty products and services, that, well, would make you look good and feel good (and hygienic, too). It gained support from the House of Representatives, including Rodito Albano III of Isabela, who said that beauty, which he said is a “luxury,” should come with a hefty price tag. 

meme-1

meme-2

meme-3

(Netizens and private companies reacted to the Vanity Tax proposal through Tweets and memes (images from Kpalette, Diary ng Babae, and @Ycapanopio))

The proposal earned the ire of the public, mostly of the women (who only wanted a Kylie lip kit at the cheapest price possible), because of the keyword “vanity.” But then again, anyone should be vain about their body. Can you imagine putting additional tax on your deodorant? 

I first learned about the issue when my friend, Kim Samia (may special mention ka, girl!), told me about this on Facebook. She was ranting about the insanity of the proposal, which we all know by now was overturned and retracted by our very noble lawmakers, thanks to the public protest. For someone who puts body lotion every day after bath, who cannot go out without her perfume, who likes lipsticks, and was recently introduced to Korean’s extensive skin care regimen (thanks to Donna de Chavez for the Korean mask recommendation!), I was one of the people who was also baffled at the news and I did not get the point of the proposal. 

The issue quickly escalated online, including on Twitter when the hashtag #DontTaxMyBeauty went trending. It was both picked up by the mainstream and alternative news sites: GMA, ABS-CBNCoconuts ManilaPhilippine Star, Manila Bulletin, Rappler, CNNSpot.ph, Cosmopolitan, Malaya, Manila StandardeCompareMo,  Philippine News NowInteraksyonSun Star DavaoCandyManila TimesAbante What’s Up Asia, Preview, Mindanao Times, and some personal blogs. But the ordinary citizens, the keyboard warriors, who have always something to say amplified the viral topic, enough to make it nationwide, with Cebu and Davao papers reporting about it. 

The topic was the talk of the town for at least three days, and gave birth to many underlying issues including women empowerment and patriarchy, and how our tax system is convoluted and ineffective. 

Here are some of what the netizens said: 

tweet-1

tweet-2

tweet-3

Everybody has always something to say, but in this case, the netizens agree to slam the Vanity Tax proposal. The Tweets are varied and open discussions on related topics like our inefficient tax system. (Tweets are screen grabbed)

How does a news item get into the consciousness of many, enough to turn make it into national news, even global? Did the vanity tax news create further ripples or repercussions? 

The journalists, as the fourth estate, have the power to set the agenda on what the public must consume and talk about. And if a news item is covered prominently, people will deem it as more important. The vanity tax story seems superficial at glance, but it has a lot of layers in it. 

The story went viral on Twitter on Jan. 10, and then the next day, different media organizations talked about the intrinsic issues of the proposal, including its misogynistic outlook. An opposition, Marikina second district Representative Miro Quimbo was quoted on Rappler saying that he thought vanity tax was “discriminatory” and sexist.  

“I think [beauty products and services are] far too small a segment to be looking at. Secondly, I don’t think it’s a luxury item at this time because it has become a necessity. Minimum wage workers today who work in Shoemart or Robinsons or go elsewhere do buy cosmetics. They’re not as expensive, but they do wear it,” he said. 

He added: “And I think it’s going to be a segmentized or discriminatory tax because the only people who will be affected will only be one side. I know some men wear makeup but that’s completely almost irrelevant. I think it can be struck down as also sex-linked.” 

While the initial news announcement about the vanity tax proposal may have died a natural death after a day or two (because that’s just how some news stories work), it gave birth to other topics that pushed the issue outside and further into the consciousness of people. The topic has many layers journalists can report about: its implications on beauty businesses, our machismo view of what is “beautiful,” and the inefficient tax system in the Philippines, for instance.

Four days after the viral news broke the Internet, Cosmopolitan magazine published a story on how much the beauty industry workers stand to lose should the vanity tax pushed through. A beautician, according to the story, takes home a meager pay of at least P6,000 a month, and would be reduced if people would stop visiting salons or giving tips because of the additional 30 percent tax. 

There are ways of looking at a story. The journalists, who have their ways on words and angles, can play at a single story and lengthen its share of the spotlight in order to explain an issue better and to push it into the awareness of many. 

Inquirer Lifestyle, for example, came out with an easy read: a Vox pop story. Some of the people asked were big business owners and what they thought about the supposed proposal. Obviously, they were against it for reasons that—surprise, surprise—it would affect their sales. 

But why are our very noble lawmakers after our lipstick and lotion? 

Contrary to Mr. Quimbo’s prior claim that our “beauty products and services are far too small a segment to be looking at,” the beauty industry in the Philippines is a serious business—a big business that costs USD 3.4 billion or P139.8 billion, according to PhilBeauty, an annual trade show organization. 

In 2015, the beauty and hygiene products significantly outgrew food, beverage, and household products in the Philippines. The BusinessWorld report said the top 10 care products in the country are wipes, colognes, liquid soap, diapers, hand and body lotions, deodorants, facial care products, talcum powder, toothbrush, and toothpaste. 

Commercialization fueled the growing trend. Rodel Taton, the Consumers Union of the Philippines, said in his BusinessWorld interview: “The growth is probably not a sign of petty obsession, but simply, commercialization (which has) heightened in such a way that many consumers tend to buy something that they believe will boost their confidence.” 

Most of the news stories I linked above reported succeeding updates about  the vanity tax as it progressed, including publishing the opposing views from the House of Representatives. But most of the online websites capitalized on the reaction of the people because they were click baits (“WTF: Vanity Tax includes your favorite shampoo and deodorant”) and the more click and share a story gets, the more page views and money it generates. Remember, the media industry, just as any industry, is still fueled by money and capitalism.

The vanity tax became news worthy and gained much traction because of its immediate effect to the people, especially to the beauty junkies and those who work in the vanity industry. 

But while the media have the power to empower a nation overwhelmed with fake news and tired from a 8-5 daily routine, they failed to do so. They choose the trivial. The media, at least in this issue, did not push the envelope to raise the awareness of the people about the repercussions of our tax reform. As a suggestion, there should have been at least informative articles or infographics about our tax system and how bad it is.  Or a resurrection of the previous investigative pieces on people who evaded tax and what happened to them today (Hi, Manny Pacquiao!).

tax

The supposedly proposed Vanity Tax plans to add 30percent to our cosmetics and hygiene products to offset the plan of increasing our income taxes. Did you know that the Philippines has one of the most number of tax exemptions in the world? (Image from #BetterBuwis Facebook page)

I think the issue stopped becoming the talk of the town when it went too “serious” and when people continued to go on with their lives after the proposal was slammed and dismissed (Yay the netizens won!).  

The media did not capitalize on the vanity tax popularity to highlight the bigger pictures: Where do our taxes go? Will the Philippines move forward from its patriarchal thinking? 

Mr. Batocabe’s suggestion was a proposal made to be an alternative to the increased taxes on fuel to offset the reduction in our income taxes. The Department of Finance proposed increase taxes on fuel and automobiles, which means an increase in oil and petroleum products. It was reported in the news, but it did not gain grip, because, hey, aren’t we all used to the stories about increasing our gas and transportation? It is an everyday news we get from whatever media resource we subscribe to. What’s new? I think people have been, time and again, saturated with these news. And when something novel and immediate came out, like the vanity tax, it naturally gained more attraction and traction. 

People have an 8 to 5 schedule and are too busy to make both ends meet than talk about the longstanding problem on our tax. We’ve always been asking about our taxes and where the hell they go. I think people are saturated about these kinds of news. 

While (some)news stories die every day, it is important to note about the birth of online civic movements. 

The power of civic movement: #DontTaxMyBeauty

People turned to Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook to slam their disapproval of the proposed tax, which they eventually won over. Here, enters our discussions on how globalization and the concept of “global village” diminish time and space. Here, also enters the idea that people are not only consumers but producers of media. People opposing the proposal made their own blog posts, memes, and short videos. Our social connectivity encourages us to voice our opinions, albeit the differences. I noticed that most of the Tweets and other posts related to the proposal did not publicly shame anyone, but instead, people stayed within the boundaries of the issue; it opened avenues for smart and prolific discussions on things that really matter. 

netizen-3

netizen-2

netizen1

Thanks to Twitter and other social media networking sites, the proposal was dismissed. (Images from Pink Sugar Cosmetics, @arrigaga, @maggiecort).

While the trending hashtag on Twitter was not as global as the Women’s March, still, it proved the power of what 140 characters could do.  

Ako Bicol Rep. Batocabe said in his interview a few days after the #DontTaxMyBeauty broke out the world wide web: 

“Eh kung ayaw ng taong-bayan, dahil nga nakikita ko nga po ‘yung mga comment ng netizens… Sinasabi nila, ‘Bakit tina-tax mo ‘yung ano… #DontTaxMyBeauty.’ Sabi ko naman, kung talagang ayaw, eh ‘di wag na nating ituloy,” he said in an interview with channel PTV4’s Good Morning Pilipinas. 

He stressed that he did not want to get in the way of people’s “happiness.” In his defense, he said that Budget Secretary Benjamin Diokno reassured him that the government has “enough [budget] for services.” Hey, if we had enough budget in the first place to offset the income tax, then what was the fuss all about?! Why did Mr. Batocabe proposed a bill that would make him appear imbecile? Hmmm… 

Anyway, he said on Rappler: “Hindi natin susuportahan tutal nagsabi naman po si [Budget] Secretary [Benjamin] Diokno, nung tinanong po siya, na may sapat pong pondo ang gobyerno. Hindi naman kailangan ang petrol [tax]. Kung ‘di naman kailangan ang petrol, ‘di naman namin ito ipu-push. Kaya ‘wag po kayong mag-alala. Hindi po natin aalisin ang inyong kaligayahan na maging maganda.” He also said the vanity tax would deprive “some people of their basic happiness.”

Really? I don’t know what to make of his last sentence. To equate cosmetics with “basic happiness” and him possibly taking away “basic happiness” only made the very noble lawmaker above the women who cried protest over his proposal. Our “happiness,” it seemed, was in his hands.  

Beauty, and the pursuit of it, has always been deemed as a “luxury” and a sin by society, which, ironically, imposes women to look presentable and beautiful. When a woman looks pale without makeup she is called unkept and unattractive. But if she wears too much of it, she is called a slut. This is why it is so easy for our lawmakers—of which majority are men—to put vanity tax alongside sin tax. When has beauty become a luxury and a sin when it is used to empower self-esteem and correct physical impairments?  

Beauty is a transnational, a universal affair. And vanity tax is not superficial.

badge

SOURCES:

http://news.mb.com.ph/2017/01/09/vanity-tax-proposal-gains-support-from-solons/

http://www.bworldonline.com/content.php?section=Economy&title=beauty-hygiene-growth-top-consumer-segment&id=114285

http://opinion.inquirer.net/100853/thinq-why-the-proposed-vanity-tax-sucks

http://www.rappler.com/nation/158484-batocabe-withdraws-support-vanity-tax-bill

Advertisements

14 thoughts on “Don’t Kill my Kilay: why vanity tax is not superficial

  1. “As a suggestion, there should have been at least informative articles or infographics about our tax system and how bad it is.”

    Hey Nickky! I like how your post is being wrapped around by your hugot saving the life of your kilay. 🙂 Your stories here, and the responses from the tweets made me laugh. Especially with Maryan’s. Have we ever gone out of so much cash that these lawmakers have nothing else sensible to tax us on? For us the working class, it is heart-breaking to see the words “withholding tax” on our payslips when the return of “investment” is just not as beneficial and apparently fruitful as we notice our surroundings everyday. And to tax even my precious Colgate Triple Action would be preposterous! Though the participatory civics that occurred in this situation I believe was within the thin and mostly voice-oriented level of engagement, it hit many points of excellence for its triumphant results. After reading Batocabe’s apparent ‘surrender’ written in one of your statements here, I thought, “takot lang lang niya sa siguro sa mga kilay niyong girls…” He knew that the imminent backlash is gonna be real and hard.” Nothing new, but amazingly enough, the power of social media platforms preempted the ‘nightmare’ that was for most women (or men) nowadays. And for him to label women’s (mostly) ‘happiness’ as something that is “basic” irked me. What does he mean by that exactly? Probably “mababaw na kaligayahan?” My thoughts were, “Mababaw na nga lang ang kaligayahan nila, ita-tax mo pa!”With comments like that, I feel like he’s belittling women (or men) just for the desire that they have to simply look and feel good about themselves.

    I also found it interesting how the use popular culture in forms of speech and even celebrities’ comments strengthened the resistance’s voice and appeal. Lastly, If I were to include these to the attributes of a viral news in my recent blog post, I’d say it gained “traction” because it is timely and contextual–because of the rise of new makeup brands being showcased online through promotion videos, and makeup tutorials, who uses/promotes these brands etc. And reiterating what you’ve said, we have also become producers of our own content nowadays and the use of makeup has been part of the circulation for most women over the past years of its existence. And in terms of it’s hypertext-ability, the instance where Kim linked, or let you know of this event helped you become aware of this issue, and these exchanges kept birthed new tweets, and linked reactions from different parts of the world. Finally, the issue mostly resonated with the people who were “hurt” by this news because makeup really meant so much to them. To say “don’t kill my kilay” is like begging not to take away a part of your being (probably why “kilay is life”). The same holds true for “Wag ang Kylie Lip Kit ko.”, and “tantanan nyo ang Kiehl’s Eye Repair cream ko”. Hence all of the retaliation…which turned out to be successful.

    I’m happy and very much glad to congratulate you Niccky, and all of the makeup enthusiasts in the Philippines. For that supposedly added 30% tax would not make your EYEBROWS ON FLEEK! And my god…I’m glad too that I can still brush my teeth!! :))

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi, Paul,

      I’m glad you felt my hugot!!! Seriously though, why propose a tax plan when in the first place pala we “have enough budget” to compensate the plans on lowering our income taxes? I think some of our lawmakers propose bills/laws that are not really well thought of…

      Yes, the online backlash against the proposal was only a thin engagement, I agree with you, but still!!! Mabuti nagbasa si sir Batocabe ng online comments!

      The gentleman from Bicol seems to equate “happiness” with cosmetics, when it isn’t! I can live without my “kilay,” but in a public sphere where women are judged by how they look, I realize I need to do my “kilay” on fleek every day.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Hi Nicky! I heard about this Vanity Tax before and said to myself, seriosuly?? lahat na lang lilalagyan nila ng tax, as if our tax now is not sufficient enough to sustain our projects and the governments’ salary. If there are less or no corrupt government officials, may be they don’t need this kind of taxes and even think about implementing it in the first place. As you said in the last part, “Beauty, and the pursuit of it, has always been deemed as a “luxury” and a sin by society, which, ironically, imposes women to look presentable and beautiful.”It is very ironic to see beauty products as luxury, when I was younger I ask questions to people randomly, like what I did with the sales lady in Landmark, I asked her, why do they wear heals, make up and tie their hair like that? She said, it was a requirement to wear a make up and heals. So I can say that it is not alone vanity for us, but a requirement for certain jobs. If ever vanity tax was push through, they are the once who will suffer more but through the heard voice of the netizens and its invincible power, the vanity tax was trashed out. Even though, I am not fan of makeups due to my ability to apply it (hahahaha), toothpaste is not vanity, it’s a necessity I cannot even imagine it. But thanks to the new media and us being active consumers, it did not push-through.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. HAHA. Salamat sa pag-special mention, Nickky!

    I have always had this feeling that we Filipinos (especially the millennials) lack the knowledge about taxes in general. We all just have this idea that we have huge withholding tax deductions and that money must go to government who, in return, does not provide good service. Sad.

    When I first saw Rep. Batocabe’s Vanity Tax proposal on Twitter (from Inquirer.Net I think), I immediately thought it was mema (may maipasang bill lang) and it would greatly affect those who are in the business, especially the female minimum wage earners with make up as requirement for their jobs. I kind of knew that it will create such virality knowing how ingenious netizens are nowadays. And ayun na nga, nag-trend. I loved how the ladies responded to it, with their witty comebacks and arguments. I also appreciated some responses that included a little ‘crash course’ for those who were totally clueless about taxes.

    Also, I have been very mindful with the articles I click nowadays because of those ‘pay-per-click’ websites with mostly clickbait articles. Indeed, digital media today capitalizes on insights, likes, reactions, comments and shares. Ayokong yumaman sila with their crappy articles so I mainly go to legitimate news sources lang. Hahaha. Alam kasi nila that when people get triggered by a viral issue, they can make money out of it.

    But indeed, I believe our little online protest (as women who appreciate the art and benefits of make up & beauty products) helped a lot in increasing awareness on how mema Rep. Batocabe’s proposal was. Jusko. Bakit ba niya minamata ang make up, medyo malayo sa pagiging Ako Bicol partylist niya.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hahaha thanks, Kim, dahil sa’yo nalaman ko ang issue na ‘to!

      Yes, I also think that some of our lawmakers propose bills/laws that are not really well thought of, and they are, like what you said, “mema.”

      Like

  4. Hi Nickky!

    As always, I like how you write! Just like what Paul said, we felt your hugot! You have provided funny but sensible images, tweets, and comments regarding your topic which made reading your blog very enjoyable.

    I totally agree with you that social media was a powerful tool in fighting against the proposed vanity tax. This I believe is an example of a positive effect of media globalization. People are not merely consumers of media but producers as well. They voiced out by using different kinds of media.

    On a different note, you also tackled on how women are judge by society on how they look. This made me thought of Lacan’s concept of the gaze. The gaze describes the relationship of the subject with the desire to look and awareness that one can be viewed. With or without make-up, there will always be judgement. It all goes down to “everyone (not just women) wants to look good when “gazed”…

    Great job Nickky! ❤

    Like

  5. Hi Nickky! I completely agree with the sentiments conveyed in your blog post. I immediately cringed at seeing this on the news. Why beauty products? Why not just increase the taxes on alcohol and cigarettes? Even higher taxes on legally purchased firearms? (I nodded while reading the part when you said that beauty products can’t kill, by the way!)

    If I’m not mistaken, maybe this can also somehow be likened to the culture of shaming. We have recently seen posts of “make-up shamers” online, those who say “make-up prevents people from seeing the real you”, or “make-up is for pretentious people who have insecurities”. So what if they like to put on make-up? It’s a form of self expression, to enhance one’s God-given features. And sorry to say for those “shamers”, as one meme post says, “You think I own 78 MAC lipsticks to impress a boy who can’t tell the difference between Ruby Woo and Russian Red? NO.”

    I’m glad you’ve chosen this topic for your blog post. You have shed light to this issue by placing the facts well and I appreciate how you have connected this to how social media has brought together many individuals who share the same opinions. This truly tells us that social media is such a powerful tool that can never be underestimated, and that we must use it to call for the change that we want to see, even down to something as simple as not pushing through with the vanity tax. Who knows what could be next? 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Hi Nickky!

    I’m glad that you liked the Korean Mask! Good job to us! 🙂

    Anyway, I was also one of the many people who reacted violently (not physically ha) when the news went out.

    I got angry because “ANG DAMING PROBLEMA SA PILIPINAS PERO BAKIT ETO PA NAISIP NILA?” Sorry, I cannot contain my feelings anymore.

    After hearing the news, I opened my Facebook account immediately. I was not shocked when I saw the posts of my friends because I knew that they would be angry as well. Same as your reaction and Kim’s.

    I believe that we are and should be in control of our face and body, of our whole being. There is a saying “As long as hindi ka nang-aapak ng iba, go lang ng go”.

    The problem with this vanity tax proposal is that knowing that we are already paying a lot of taxes for projects that we can’t even feel, they are expecting us to pay another tax just for us to feel beautiful.

    Also, as I have said earlier, there are many problems in our country that they should give their attention to and not to our faces. They should focus on education projects and health projects that would benefit almost all the Filipinos.

    Do they think that imposing this vanity tax would stop us from purchasing make-ups? Maybe yes, maybe no. But that won’t stop us from loving ourselves.

    If this vanity tax got approved (thank God buti hindi talaga approved), I believe that up to now, this news is still trending and netizens will do everything just to stop this act.

    There is a part where I heard that they want to impose this vanity tax because they want women to lessen the use of make-ups and just be natural. All I can say is they shouldn’t care if we want to be natural or not. Happiness is always subjective. This is our face. This is our body. We can do whatever we want to do it as long as we are not hurting other people.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Although this is just a “proposed bill” by Ako-Bicol party-list Rep. Rodel Batocabe in place of excise taxes on fuel, I think the government shall focus first on uncollected amount to almost 400 billion pesos before thinking to impose taxes on make-up and other beauty products to offset a planned reduction in income taxes.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Hindi ako pwedeng hindi mag-comment dito because as you know, #KilayIsLife As usual, winner ka magsulat beh ♥

    When I heard about the idea of Vanity Tax, I reacted violently too (kaway-kaway, Donna hehe). I don’t understand what is so wrong about being hygienic or adding a little extra to our already beautiful selves (YES), Basic happiness daw? Nah. Food>Beauty :))) The Vanity Tax suggestion was not well thought of, mema sabi nga ni Kim.

    I got particularly irritated with the statement “Hindi po natin aalisin ang inyong kaligayahan na maging maganda.” Like excuse me, who told him that women need make up to be beautiful? We wear make up because we like to, not to impress anyone (but ourselves maybe because I find putting on make up rather therapeutic mehehe).

    Cheers, Nickky, for your amazing write up!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s